Difference between revisions of "Fonts"

From Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
You have to define "definefontfallback"
 
You have to define "definefontfallback"
 
A quite complete example: [[Alegreya_Typescript]]
 
  
  
Line 30: Line 28:
 
* [http://pmrb.free.fr/contextref.pdf#[145,{%22name%22:%22Fit%22}] in the whole manual]
 
* [http://pmrb.free.fr/contextref.pdf#[145,{%22name%22:%22Fit%22}] in the whole manual]
 
* [http://context.aanhet.net/svn/contextman/context-reference/en/co-fonts.pdf#[3,{%22name%22:%22Fit%22}] as a separate document] section "Simple font definitions"
 
* [http://context.aanhet.net/svn/contextman/context-reference/en/co-fonts.pdf#[3,{%22name%22:%22Fit%22}] as a separate document] section "Simple font definitions"
 
  
 
== I want use specific features ==
 
== I want use specific features ==

Revision as of 17:57, 1 June 2020


Using fonts with TeX was once a Jedi fight. Since (2013 /2015 ?), and LuaTeX development.

NOWADAYS, IT'S A PIECE OF CAKE.


Advanced stuff

You have to define "definefontfallback"


Style, see the font chapter, of the never really issued Reference Manual:

I want use specific features

  • Small caps
  • Ligatures
  • Kerning
  • expansion=quality
  • protrusion=quality,
  • other: tlig, ccmp, fonts-mkiv.pdf page 65.


weight light, regular, medium, bold, extra... width : condensed, Semi Condensed , regular, Semi Extended , Extended shape : regular, italic caps : regular, smallcaps

Liens

I just have realised that \definefont requires fontname of font not identifier neither familyname.