Difference between revisions of "Fontsize"

From Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
::::: <i>This page is based on Taco's explanation in the list [2018-12-19].</i>
 
::::: <i>This page is based on Taco's explanation in the list [2018-12-19].</i>
  
====== ''The font designer decides on the ‘natural’ size of the font.'' ======
+
==== ''The font designer decides on the ‘natural’ size of the font.'' ====
  
 
There are two parts to this:
 
There are two parts to this:
  
* First, what the ‘natural’ size indicates is the designer’s
+
* '''What the ‘natural’ size indicates.'''
_intended use size_ for the font, such that when you plan
 
to use the font “Times-Roman” without any special rescaling,
 
it should in fact be equivalent to “Times-Roman at ’natural size’”.
 
  
For most fonts, this ‘natural size’ is 10&thinnbsp;pt, but special display
+
First, what the ‘natural’ size indicates is the designer’s
 +
_intended use size_ for the font, such that when you plan
 +
to use the font “Times-Roman” without any special rescaling,
 +
it should in fact be equivalent  to “Times-Roman at ’natural size’”.
 +
 
 +
For most fonts, this ‘natural size’ is 10&nbsp;pt, but special display
 
or footnote fonts may have a different intended use size, and the
 
or footnote fonts may have a different intended use size, and the
font designer may have made special glyph adjustments for that
+
font designer may have made special glyph adjustments for that purpose.
purpose. For example, the computer modern family has special fonts
+
For example, the computer modern family has special fonts
with a ‘natural’ size anywhere between 5pt and 17pt. The glyphs in
+
with a ‘natural’ size anywhere between 5&nbsp;pt and 17&nbsp;pt.  
the specific fonts with a smaller ‘natural’ size (like 8pt)
+
 
 +
The glyphs in the specific fonts with a smaller ‘natural’ size (like 8&nbsp;pt)
 
are in fact a little bit bolder and wider than the same glyphs in
 
are in fact a little bit bolder and wider than the same glyphs in
the font designed to be used at 10pt. This makes sense when you
+
the font designed to be used at 10&nbsp;pt. This makes sense when you
consider that the 8pt font is likely be used along with the 10pt
+
consider that the 8&nbsp;pt font is likely be used along with the 10pt
font for e.g. footnotes. The 10pt font used at 8pt size would look
+
font for e.g. footnotes. The 10&nbsp;pt font used at 8&nbsp;pt size would look
thinner and weaker than the actual font designed for 8pt.
+
thinner and weaker than the actual font designed for 8&nbsp;pt.
 +
 
 +
* '''What the ‘design’ size indicates.'''
  
* Second, a design size in points like ‘10pt’ is somewhat misleading,
+
Second, a design size in points like ‘10&nbsp;pt’ is somewhat misleading,
 
because what it actually is, is just a different way of saying “at
 
because what it actually is, is just a different way of saying “at
the expected size for traditional main text”. The “10pt" is not
+
the expected size for traditional main text”. The “10&nbsp;pt" is notf
 
necessarily a measure of _anything_ in the font. In fact, font designers
 
necessarily a measure of _anything_ in the font. In fact, font designers
sometimes do not use a “XXpt” design size at all.The Minion font family
+
sometimes do not use a “XX&nbsp;pt” design size at all. The Minion font family
 
has fonts with names like "Minion Pro Caption" and "Minion Pro Display”,
 
has fonts with names like "Minion Pro Caption" and "Minion Pro Display”,
 
which is actually a better indication of the information the font
 
which is actually a better indication of the information the font
 
designer wants to convey.
 
designer wants to convey.
 
  
 
That leaves the question of what the actual size is of a font used
 
That leaves the question of what the actual size is of a font used
at “10pt”. As explained above, there are no hard rules. But usually
+
at “10&nbsp;pt”. As explained above, there are no hard rules. But usually
for a modern font the “10pt" is the _vertical_ space needed to enclose
+
for a modern font the “10&nbsp;pt" is the _vertical_ space needed to enclose
 
all of the ascenders and descenders in the font when all the glyphs
 
all of the ascenders and descenders in the font when all the glyphs
 
are overlaid on top of each other. Traditionally, this was also the
 
are overlaid on top of each other. Traditionally, this was also the
Line 44: Line 48:
 
(and it really only applied to ‘upright’ fonts anyways).
 
(and it really only applied to ‘upright’ fonts anyways).
  
 
+
==== ''If two fonts have the same size, is a dimension which has the same length in both. Which one is this?'' ====
====== ''If two fonts have the same size, is a dimension which has the same length in both. Which one is this?'' ======
 
  
 
No, there is no such thing. "TeX Gyre Bonum and TeX Gyre Adventor at twelve
 
No, there is no such thing. "TeX Gyre Bonum and TeX Gyre Adventor at twelve
Line 53: Line 56:
 
   intended and TeX Gyre Adventor at a somewhat larger size than the TeX Gyre
 
   intended and TeX Gyre Adventor at a somewhat larger size than the TeX Gyre
 
   Adventor designer intended."
 
   Adventor designer intended."
 +
 +
 +
[[Category:Fonts]]

Latest revision as of 14:19, 8 June 2020

What defines the size in a font?

This page is based on Taco's explanation in the list [2018-12-19].

The font designer decides on the ‘natural’ size of the font.

There are two parts to this:

  • What the ‘natural’ size indicates.

First, what the ‘natural’ size indicates is the designer’s _intended use size_ for the font, such that when you plan to use the font “Times-Roman” without any special rescaling, it should in fact be equivalent to “Times-Roman at ’natural size’”.

For most fonts, this ‘natural size’ is 10 pt, but special display or footnote fonts may have a different intended use size, and the font designer may have made special glyph adjustments for that purpose. For example, the computer modern family has special fonts with a ‘natural’ size anywhere between 5 pt and 17 pt.

The glyphs in the specific fonts with a smaller ‘natural’ size (like 8 pt) are in fact a little bit bolder and wider than the same glyphs in the font designed to be used at 10 pt. This makes sense when you consider that the 8 pt font is likely be used along with the 10pt font for e.g. footnotes. The 10 pt font used at 8 pt size would look thinner and weaker than the actual font designed for 8 pt.

  • What the ‘design’ size indicates.

Second, a design size in points like ‘10 pt’ is somewhat misleading, because what it actually is, is just a different way of saying “at the expected size for traditional main text”. The “10 pt" is notf necessarily a measure of _anything_ in the font. In fact, font designers sometimes do not use a “XX pt” design size at all. The Minion font family has fonts with names like "Minion Pro Caption" and "Minion Pro Display”, which is actually a better indication of the information the font designer wants to convey.

That leaves the question of what the actual size is of a font used at “10 pt”. As explained above, there are no hard rules. But usually for a modern font the “10 pt" is the _vertical_ space needed to enclose all of the ascenders and descenders in the font when all the glyphs are overlaid on top of each other. Traditionally, this was also the with of an ‘em’, going back to the Roman era, where inscribed text fitted characters into a square. But these days that is no longer always the case, since some font families have condensed or extended members (and it really only applied to ‘upright’ fonts anyways).

If two fonts have the same size, is a dimension which has the same length in both. Which one is this?

No, there is no such thing. "TeX Gyre Bonum and TeX Gyre Adventor at twelve point” really only means this:

 "TeX Gyre Bonum at a somewhat larger size than the TeX Gyre Bonum designer
 intended and TeX Gyre Adventor at a somewhat larger size than the TeX Gyre
 Adventor designer intended."