Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bold typewriter"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Ok, why is there almost-redundant commented-out code in the example?) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why the alternate version of the font definitions that's commented out? I think that be deleted, or turned into an "alternately, use this" section, but which one? | Why the alternate version of the font definitions that's commented out? I think that be deleted, or turned into an "alternately, use this" section, but which one? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Both font groups are part of the same cm-extra distribution, but the cmbtt{8,9,10} fonts are both newer and there are there 3 instead of 1. Users will normally have both, or none, so I propose to use the cmbttXX ones and delete the other set from the example. | ||
| + | --[[User:Taco|Taco]] | ||
Revision as of 14:30, 6 August 2004
Why the alternate version of the font definitions that's commented out? I think that be deleted, or turned into an "alternately, use this" section, but which one?
Both font groups are part of the same cm-extra distribution, but the cmbtt{8,9,10} fonts are both newer and there are there 3 instead of 1. Users will normally have both, or none, so I propose to use the cmbttXX ones and delete the other set from the example.
--Taco
