Difference between revisions of "Talk:Math"

From Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Explanation of Pythagoras's unfortunate demise.)
(Request for help with a confusing bit of formula numbering in the Math page.)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
Yes, the "\quotation{$c^2 = a^2 + b^2$}, says Pythagoras with inline math." example was cute, but I think the "\quotation" makes it unclear unless one already knows how to do inline math, so I replaced it with a clearer example.  Sorry for losing the whimsicality. --[[User:Brooks|Brooks]] 21:32, 9 Jul 2005 (CEST)
 
Yes, the "\quotation{$c^2 = a^2 + b^2$}, says Pythagoras with inline math." example was cute, but I think the "\quotation" makes it unclear unless one already knows how to do inline math, so I replaced it with a clearer example.  Sorry for losing the whimsicality. --[[User:Brooks|Brooks]] 21:32, 9 Jul 2005 (CEST)
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
Can someone explain why my middle example from the Formula Numbering section doesn't work without the explicit <tt>let</tt> command?  There should be a better way of doing this!  --[[User:Brooks|Brooks]] 21:04, 11 Jul 2005 (CEST)

Revision as of 19:06, 11 July 2005

Could someone (Giuseppe?) please explain the differences of nath and amsl (AMSmath) etc.? AFAIK they are two different modules, and AFAIR there's also a LaTeX-nath, isn't it? --Hraban 16:41, 12 Sep 2004 (CEST)


Yes, the "\quotation{$c^2 = a^2 + b^2$}, says Pythagoras with inline math." example was cute, but I think the "\quotation" makes it unclear unless one already knows how to do inline math, so I replaced it with a clearer example. Sorry for losing the whimsicality. --Brooks 21:32, 9 Jul 2005 (CEST)


Can someone explain why my middle example from the Formula Numbering section doesn't work without the explicit let command? There should be a better way of doing this! --Brooks 21:04, 11 Jul 2005 (CEST)