Difference between revisions of "Talk:Inside ConTeXt"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It would make sense to have texshow-style documentation for the low-level macros. | It would make sense to have texshow-style documentation for the low-level macros. | ||
How about [[Commands::getparameters]] et. al. ? Or [[\getparameters]] ? | How about [[Commands::getparameters]] et. al. ? Or [[\getparameters]] ? | ||
+ | * yes, it would make much sense, but not in here. We should add them to texshow*, so they would be available not only to the online users but also to etexshow and perhaps other xml based texshow out there. | ||
+ | ** who does the job? The commands have to be given in an xml format, wich is not that trivial (but not complex either) | ||
+ | ** how do we keep the user interface of texshow(-whatever) clean? I would have to program some kind of filter based on keywords - but I wanted to do this anyway :-) | ||
+ | ** I'll post some more on this topic soon, since I'll work on texshow for a bit now | ||
+ | --[[User:Patrick Gundlach|Patrick Gundlach]] 11:12, 5 Aug 2004 (CEST) |
Revision as of 09:14, 5 August 2004
It would make sense to have texshow-style documentation for the low-level macros. How about Commands::getparameters et. al. ? Or \getparameters ?
- yes, it would make much sense, but not in here. We should add them to texshow*, so they would be available not only to the online users but also to etexshow and perhaps other xml based texshow out there.
- who does the job? The commands have to be given in an xml format, wich is not that trivial (but not complex either)
- how do we keep the user interface of texshow(-whatever) clean? I would have to program some kind of filter based on keywords - but I wanted to do this anyway :-)
- I'll post some more on this topic soon, since I'll work on texshow for a bit now
--Patrick Gundlach 11:12, 5 Aug 2004 (CEST)