Difference between revisions of "Talk:Inside ConTeXt"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
** I'll post some more on this topic soon, since I'll work on texshow for a bit now | ** I'll post some more on this topic soon, since I'll work on texshow for a bit now | ||
--[[User:Patrick Gundlach|Patrick Gundlach]] 11:12, 5 Aug 2004 (CEST) | --[[User:Patrick Gundlach|Patrick Gundlach]] 11:12, 5 Aug 2004 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The initial comment was me (I keep getting logged out for discernable reason). | ||
+ | ** It seems to me that the best way to do this is to consider the programmer-level macro's to be an extra interface (named 'api'). | ||
+ | ** I volunteer for the creation of (at least the beginnings of) the needed XML. | ||
+ | ** I propose starting with a really barebones XML file that only lists the macros themselves (no invocation syntax), then add the correct definitions interactively using texshow-web itself. | ||
+ | --[[User:Taco|Taco]] |
Revision as of 09:46, 5 August 2004
It would make sense to have texshow-style documentation for the low-level macros. How about Commands::getparameters et. al. ? Or \getparameters ?
- yes, it would make much sense, but not in here. We should add them to texshow*, so they would be available not only to the online users but also to etexshow and perhaps other xml based texshow out there.
- who does the job? The commands have to be given in an xml format, wich is not that trivial (but not complex either)
- how do we keep the user interface of texshow(-whatever) clean? I would have to program some kind of filter based on keywords - but I wanted to do this anyway :-)
- I'll post some more on this topic soon, since I'll work on texshow for a bit now
--Patrick Gundlach 11:12, 5 Aug 2004 (CEST)
- The initial comment was me (I keep getting logged out for discernable reason).
- It seems to me that the best way to do this is to consider the programmer-level macro's to be an extra interface (named 'api').
- I volunteer for the creation of (at least the beginnings of) the needed XML.
- I propose starting with a really barebones XML file that only lists the macros themselves (no invocation syntax), then add the correct definitions interactively using texshow-web itself.
--Taco